Unlike the monumental stone architecture of the Iron Age, the paintings were created by communities of hunter-gatherers who used the shelters as temporary camps or places of ritual significance. Although difficult to date with precision, stylistic comparisons with other rock art sites across the Deccan suggest that some of the paintings may have originated during the Mesolithic period, perhaps between 6000 and 3000 BCE, while others may belong to later prehistoric phases. This means the artists who decorated these shelters lived several thousand years before the people who constructed the nearby dolmens.
The paintings were executed primarily in red ochre, a naturally occurring iron-rich pigment that has survived remarkably well on the protected sandstone surfaces. In most places weathering has faded the images almost beyond recognition.
One of the fascinating aspects of Indian rock art is that many shelters contain paintings from several different periods. Later generations repeatedly returned to the same locations, sometimes adding new figures alongside earlier ones. The result is a visual record spanning centuries, or even millennia, demonstrating the enduring significance of particular places within the landscape.
Although potentially separated by thousands of years, the rock art and the dolmens illustrate an important principle in archaeology: landscapes often retain their significance long after the cultures that first occupied them have disappeared.
The hunter-gatherers who painted the shelters almost certainly had no connection with the Iron Age communities who later erected the dolmens. Their economies, technologies and ways of life were fundamentally different. Yet both groups were drawn to the same sandstone hills overlooking the Malaprabha valley.
Centuries later, the Early Chalukyas selected these same hillsides for one of India’s most important centres of temple architecture. The summit of Meguti Hill became the setting for the celebrated Meguti Jain Temple, while its lower slopes were excavated to create the Mena Basti cave. Whether consciously or unconsciously, the Chalukyan builders became part of a tradition of human activity on the hill that already stretched back several thousand years.
This remarkable continuity transforms Meguti Hill from a simple archaeological site into a cultural landscape. Every period has left its mark, creating a sequence that extends from prehistoric artists and Iron Age communities to medieval architects and modern visitors.
Exploring the dolmen field and rock shelters requires little more than a reasonable level of fitness and suitable footwear. The climb from Mena Basti is short, but the sandstone can become slippery after rain and extremely hot during the middle of the day. Early morning or late afternoon offers the most comfortable conditions, while the elevated position provides magnificent views across the temple complexes and surrounding countryside.
Visitors should remember that these are fragile archaeological remains rather than picnic sites. The dolmens should never be climbed upon, and the rock paintings should only be viewed from a respectful distance without touching the decorated surfaces. A pair of binoculars or a camera with a zoom lens can often reveal faded details that are otherwise difficult to distinguish.
Aihole’s temples rightly attract international attention, yet they represent only one chapter in a much longer human story. The prehistoric rock art and the Meguti Hill dolmen field remind us that people had already been living, creating and commemorating their dead in this landscape for thousands of years before the first Chalukyan architect laid a foundation stone.
For those willing to venture beyond the familiar temple circuit, these little-visited sites offer a rare opportunity to experience Aihole as archaeologists see it: not simply as the birthplace of Indian temple architecture, but as a landscape preserving an almost uninterrupted record of human activity from prehistory to the medieval world. Standing amongst the silent dolmens, with the painted shelters below and the temples of Aihole spread across the valley, it becomes possible to appreciate the extraordinary depth of history contained within this remarkable corner of Karnataka.
Aihole inscriptions
 |
Aihole inscription |
Links about Aihole inscriptions:
http://www.sdstate.edu/projectsouthasia/upload/Aihole-Inscription-of-Pulikeshin-II.pdf
Aihole
In Aihole dominant religion was Shaivism of the Pashpata-Kalamukha school. Other currents and religions are also present, Buddhist and Jaina.
Groups of temples in Aihole
Important temples at Aihole
- Durga temple complex(13 Temples)
- Lad Khan Temple
- Ambigera Gudi complex
- Mallikarjuna temple complex
- Chikki temple
- Rachi temple
- Eniyar temples complex
- Hucchimalli temple complex
- Ravanaphadi rock-cut temple
- Buddhist temple, Meguti temple
- Hucchappayya Math Complex
- Kunti temples complex
- Charantimath complex
- Tryambakesvara group
- Gauri temple
- Jaina temples in the village
- Rock-cut Jain Basadi
- Ramlingesvara Temple Complex
- Galaganatha Temple Complex
Lad Khan Temple
The Lad Khan Temple, dedicated to Shiva, is a one of the oldest temples in Aihole. It was built in the 5th century by the Chalukyas. It is located to the south of the Durga Temple. The temple is named after a muslim prince who turned this temple into his residence for a short period.
The temple consists of a garba griha with mantapa in front of it. The mukha mandapa is situated in front of the sanctum and consists of a set of 12 carved pillars. The sabha mandapa leads to the maha mandapa and the pillars are arranged to form two concentric squares. The walls have floral patterns on them and the windows have lattice work done in the northern style. Facing the sanctum, a second smaller sanctum is situated above the center of the hall whose outer walls have many carved images.
Originally dedicated to Vishnu, now the main shrine houses a Shiva Linga with a Nandi. The temple was built in a Panchayatana style, indicating a very early experiment in temple construction. The special feature of this temple is that it starts with a rectangular structure and ends with a square structure. Based on a wooden construction design , the square and rectangular plan has a steep roof, which is an adaptation of wooden styles in stone.
The maha mantapa is open to exterior by large windows between the pillars. The roof above the maha mantapa shows a turret as a first version of the futures towers sikharas and vimanas.
Ambigeara Gudi group
Ramalinga Temple group
Two story Buddhist Chaitya
*Group of Yeniar Shrines, a little further away to the south, along the river bank are this group of eight temples, usually with a porch, hall and a cella, all of about 12th century
*Jain cave temple at the entrance of the Aihole (from Pattadakal/Badami) on the banks of Mallaprabha river it is similar to Ravana Phadi cave, there are inscriptions on rock in old Kannada near the cave.
Aihole is a pretty village 10km north-east of Pattadakal and 25km from Badami in Karnataka. It’s well worth combining Aihole with a trip to the other perhaps more well known temple sites. Here is an extensive collection of Jain and Hindu shrines in various architectural styles dating from the 6th to 12th centuries.
Although there are some 30 temples dotted around the village of Aihole, the focal point is a cluster in the heart of the village where you will need to purchase a entrance ticket. The first temple in this specific compound is the Durga Temple, not however dedicated to the goddess, it is named because of it’s proximity to the nearby durg, or fort.
The Durga Tenple is considered one of India’s finest and most unusual early temples, with a horseshoe-shaped design similar to many Buddhist rock-cut temples. The covered passageway around the relatively bare interior has some amazing carvings, such as Durga killing a demon buffalo. Similarly the porch of the temple has a number of fine carvings, including several amorous couples. The carvings from the ceiling are now in the National Museum in Delhi.
South of the Durga Temple are several more shrines, my favourite being the Ladkhan Temple. The design of this temple is unusual in that it was usually used for wooden buildings, with a roof structure made to look like split logs. Inside is an extremely photogenic Nandi bull in the assembly area, if you have the temple to yourself it’s quite a magical and atmospheric experience.
There are many smaller shrines in the compound that are worth exploring, the Sura Narayana Temple, Gaudar Gudi Temple, Badiger Gudi Temple and the Chakra Gudo Temple.
Outside the compound there are many other temples to explore, I was a little bewildered where to head for. I turned right on leaving the entrance, went straight ahead at the crossroads, and then turned left into the Chikki Temple Complex.
This was absent of any visitors, which may have been what enticed me to go there, but it’s worth seeking out. These are 7th century structures, and the carvings inside are exquisite, in particular the ceiling. A caretaker was quietly snoozing inside the main covered temple, leaving me to quietly tip-toe around the interior taking a few shots of the carved scenes. Luckily I didn’t wake him up.
This temple was every bit as enjoyable as the main cluster that attracts all the visitors, it really does pay to explore a bit further afield.
On leaving Aihole village it was clear something was happening. Finely decorated carts were appearing from all directions, and clearly families were heading somewhere specific. This was March 23rd 2013 so I can only imagine it was some kind of festival day, possibly the start of the Hindi new year (?). If anyone knows for sure, I’d really like to know !
Not far out of Aihole we came to another set of temples, not as well maintained as those at Aihole and surrounded by daily life. If you can find it, and I’m afraid I don’t know the name of this place, it’s worth spending 20 minutes to wonder around.
The main temple complex at Aihole is open sunrise to sunset.
If you’re interested in using any of my photography or articles please get in touch. I’m also available for any freelance work worldwide, my duffel bag is always packed ready to go…
Rock-cut Jain Basti (Mena Basti) – Aihole
Hidden beneath the sandstone slopes of Meguti Hill, the rock-cut Jain Basti, better known as Mena Basti, is one of Aihole’s least-visited yet most rewarding monuments. Overshadowed by the celebrated Durga Temple, the Lad Khan Temple and the hilltop Meguti Jain Temple, this modest cave sanctuary is often overlooked by visitors. Yet despite its comparatively small size, it occupies an important place in the architectural history of southern India, representing one of the earliest surviving Jain cave temples in Karnataka and a significant stage in the evolution of Early Chalukyan architecture.
Unlike the great structural temples that define Aihole today, Mena Basti was excavated directly into the sandstone bedrock. It belongs to a period during the late sixth or early seventh century when Chalukyan craftsmen were experimenting with architectural forms that would later reach maturity in the magnificent temples of Pattadakal. The cave therefore preserves an important transitional phase, demonstrating how architects refined ideas in rock before applying them to free-standing stone buildings.
The monument also reflects the religious diversity of the Early Chalukya kingdom. Although Aihole is best known for its Hindu temples, Jainism flourished alongside Shaivism and Vaishnavism, supported by prosperous merchant communities and influential patrons. The Rock-cut Jain Basti, together with the nearby Meguti Jain Temple, illustrates the important contribution of Jain communities to the remarkable architectural flowering that transformed Aihole into one of the most innovative building centres of early medieval India. Today, the cave retains an atmosphere very different from Aihole’s more frequently visited monuments. Sheltered beneath the natural sandstone escarpment, it is cool, peaceful and remarkably quiet.
Jainism had been established in the Deccan long before the rise of the Chalukyas, flourishing through networks of merchants, monks and scholars who travelled widely across western and southern India. By the sixth century, prosperous Jain communities had become an important part of the social and economic life of the Malaprabha Valley, commissioning temples and supporting religious institutions alongside their Hindu contemporaries.
Although the Early Chalukya rulers are principally associated with the construction of Hindu temples, they generally fostered an atmosphere of religious tolerance that allowed multiple faiths to prosper. This diversity is reflected in Aihole itself, where Hindu, Jain and Buddhist monuments stand within a remarkably compact archaeological landscape.
The most famous Jain monument at Aihole is the Meguti Jain Temple, whose inscription, composed in 634 CE by the poet Ravikirti, records the achievements of the Chalukya emperor Pulakeshin II. Less conspicuous, but probably earlier in date, is the rock-cut Jain Basti beneath the hill. Together they illustrate the continuity of Jain patronage during the formative years of Chalukyan architecture.
Adapted from plan featured in Encyclopaedia of Jaina Studies, Vol. I: Jaina Art and Architecture
Unlike Meguti, however, Mena Basti contains no dedicatory inscription. Its date is therefore established primarily through architectural comparison. Most scholars attribute the cave to the late sixth or early seventh century, noting its close relationship to the earliest cave temples at Badami while recognising its more restrained treatment when compared with the increasingly elaborate structural temples built later in the century.
Even the monument’s popular name remains uncertain. While basadi (or basti) is the traditional Kannada word for a Jain temple, the origin of the word Mena has never been satisfactorily explained. It may preserve a local tradition that has long since been forgotten, or it may simply be a later name attached to the monument after its original dedication had passed from memory.
The façade of Mena Basti has significantly changed from its original appearance. What was once an open veranda has now been enclosed by three courses of large sandstone blocks, with a simple entrance doorway. Unlike the dramatic entrances of later rock-cut Jain caves, there is no attempt to impress through monumental scale or dense sculptural decoration.
The veranda measures 9.7m x 2.1m. At one end stands Parshvanatha beneath the protective canopy of a multi-headed serpent. According to Jain tradition, the serpent king Dharanendra sheltered Parshvanatha while he meditated during a violent storm, making the serpent canopy the defining attribute by which he is recognised in Jain art. The Tirthankara stands motionless in the kayotsarga posture, his expression calm and detached despite the dramatic symbolism of the serpent above him.
Facing Parshvanatha at the opposite end of the veranda is the image of Bahubali (Gommateshwara ), one of the most revered figures in Jain tradition. Having renounced his kingdom, Bahubali entered such profound meditation that vines grew around his legs while he remained completely motionless. These delicately carved creepers are among the most distinctive features of the sculpture, symbolising total detachment from the material world.
Although later representations (most famously the colossal monolithic statue at Shravanbelagola) would become far more monumental, the essential iconography is already fully developed at Mena Basti.
The veranda ceiling is beautifully carved with Swastika designs, leaf motifs and lotuses. Human figures are also seen emerging from the mouths of makara-mukhas.
The wonderfully carved ceiling extends into the hall (4.6m x 5.3m), which has a huge central lotus set inside a square. Four more lotuses are carved at the four corners of the hall ceiling alongside carved images of makaras, fishes, flowers, and human heads. On the floor at the center of the hall is a damaged lotus.
One the back wall of the hall are two dvārapālas with high headdresses, guarding the main shrine. One is attended by a male dwarf, and the other by a female.
A doorway on the left of the hall leads to a narrow chamber (4.2m x 1.5m) that is densely carved with images. The lack of available space and light made this particularly difficult to photograph. It depicts Mahavîra on his lion throne in the middle of the back wall with chauri-bearers, and about a dozen other figures, some riding elephants, apparently coming to pay him homage. In the dim light it’s hard to make out some of the figures, and it would seem this entire composition was never fully completed.
On the opposite side of the hall is a corresponding chamber that is completely empty of any carvings, I can only assume worked stopped before this was ever attempted.
The entrance to the shrine like that to the hall is divided into three apertures by two pillars. Within the shrine (2.5m x 2.5m) is a sitting figure of the Tirthankara, with two attendants.
Several short early Kannada inscriptions are engraved on the rocks surrounding the entrance to the cave. Dating principally to the sixth and seventh centuries, these brief records commemorate donations made by Jain devotees, including the consecration of images and gifts to the resident monastic community. Although many are now quite badly weathered and preserve little more than the names of donors, they provide valuable evidence that the cave remained an active centre of Jain worship long after its excavation. I have been unable to find any translations of these inscriptions on-line, but two of them are extremely easy to find when visiting.
For those willing to venture a little beyond Aihole’s better-known monuments, the area surrounding Mena Basti offers some remarkable prehistoric remains. Rock shelters containing ancient rock art lie only a short distance from the temple, while a brief scramble to the summit of Meguti Hill reveals an extensive prehistoric dolmen field stretching across the plateau. For anyone with an interest in archaeology, these lesser-known sites are every bit as rewarding as Aihole’s famous monuments. I will explore both in more detail in a future blog post.
The rock-cut Jain Basti, or Mena Basti, is one of Aihole’s most understated monuments, yet it ranks among the most important early Jain temples in southern India. Excavated during the formative years of the Early Chalukya dynasty, it captures a pivotal moment in the evolution of Deccan architecture, when craftsmen were refining ideas that would later culminate in the magnificent temples of Pattadakal.
Overshadowed by Aihole’s more famous monuments, Mena Basti stands as a testament to the skill of Early Chalukyan craftsmen and to the important role played by Jain communities in shaping the artistic heritage of the Malaprabha Valley. More than thirteen centuries after its excavation, this quiet sanctuary remains one of the clearest expressions of the experimental spirit that made Aihole one of the birthplaces of Indian temple architecture.
Ravana Phadi: A Masterpiece of Early Chalukyan Sculpture and Architecture – Aihole
Hidden amongst the weathered sandstone outcrops on the northeastern edge of Aihole lies one of the earliest and most remarkable achievements of Early Chalukyan rock-cut architecture. Known as Ravana Phadi (also spelled Ravalaphadi or Ravanaphadi), this comparatively modest cave temple is often overlooked by visitors heading instead to Aihole’s celebrated Durga Temple or Lad Khan Temple. Yet behind its unassuming exterior lies one of the finest sculptural ensembles of the sixth century CE, offering an invaluable insight into the formative years of Indian temple architecture.
Carved directly into the sandstone bedrock during the sixth century CE, Ravana Phadi belongs to a pivotal period in Early Chalukyan history when architects and craftsmen were simultaneously experimenting with excavated cave sanctuaries and free-standing structural temples. The cave occupies a key position within this architectural evolution, bridging earlier Deccan rock-cut traditions with the increasingly sophisticated temple forms that would eventually reach their zenith at Pattadakal and exert a lasting influence on the development of South Indian architecture. Despite its relatively compact scale, the monument displays remarkable artistic confidence through its carefully conceived layout, monumental sculptural programme, and seamless integration of architecture and relief carving.
Dedicated primarily to Shiva, Ravana Phadi contains an extraordinary programme of sculptural decoration. The vitality and fluidity of its carving, particularly the dynamic representation of Shiva as the cosmic dancer, rank amongst the supreme achievements of early medieval Indian sculpture.
Standing before the cave are several intriguing monuments that together form a small sacred complex. These include a worn fluted column, its distinctive amalaka capital now lying fallen to one side, a sculpted image of Nandi, a rock-cut Shiva linga, and three small shrines.
Each shrine possesses a porch leading into a chamber, while one is surmounted by a rudimentary kuta-type roof. The shrine closest to the cave entrance has clearly undergone restoration, evident from the noticeably poorer quality of its carved front pillars when compared with the earlier work.
The entrance to Ravana Phadi is flanked by heavily weathered relief sculptures. On either side sit pot-bellied Nidhis, symbols of wealth, housed within miniature Dravida-style pavilions (1 & 2). Beside them stand armed guardians wearing distinctive skirt-like garments and carrying spears. Although their features have been badly worn by centuries of weathering, these figures are sometimes interpreted as foreigners, possibly Scythian mercenaries who served at the Early Chalukya court.
Beyond the entrance lies the rock-cut mandapa, from which chambers open on three sides. Each chamber is approached through a triple-bayed opening defined by a pair of monolithic columns, while the intervening wall surfaces are richly ornamented with large sculptural reliefs.
Beginning to the left of the entrance and proceeding clockwise around the mandapa, the principal sculptures comprise:
- Shiva as Ardhanarishvara (3), the divine fusion of male and female, depicted as half man and half woman while holding a trident.
Right : Shiva as Ardhanarishvara (3)
- A pair of two-armed Shaiva guardians bearing weapons and standing on either side of the triple-bayed entrance to the Shiva linga sanctum (5 & 6).
- Harihara (7), the combined manifestation of Vishnu and Shiva, represented with four arms, two of which hold a serpent and a conch.
- Shiva with the three river goddesses above his head, accompanied by Parvati and the skeletal ascetic Bhringi, who is shown balancing on a single leg to the right of the sanctuary entrance (8).
The ceiling of the mandapa has been treated as though it were a richly decorated textile canopy. At its centre is a shallow lotus medallion surrounded by ornamental bands incorporating human torsos, makaras, and fish, creating an effect that is both elegant and highly imaginative.
The left-hand side chamber contains the cave’s greatest sculptural masterpiece: an elaborate panel (4) dominated by the ten-armed Shiva performing the cosmic dance.
The god strides energetically across the panel, his head dramatically turned in relation to his torso, while his upper rear hands grasp a cobra. Shiva is accompanied by Parvati together with a complete assemblage of the Saptamatrikas, including the boar-headed Varahi and the triple-headed Brahmi, as well as Ganesha and Kartikeya.
These figures, along with those decorating the walls of the mandapa, display the characteristic elegance of Early Chalukyan sculpture, with their slender proportions, finely pleated garments, elaborately worked jewellery, and tall conical crowns backed by circular fluted discs. Traces of surviving pigment further reveal that the entire sculptural programme was once brightly painted.
Directly opposite the entrance, the triple-bayed opening leads through a small vestibule into the sanctuary. The vestibule’s side walls are decorated with two deeply carved relief panels. On the left is Vishnu in his Varaha incarnation rescuing the earth goddess Bhudevi (9), while on the right is Durga , thrusting her spear into Mahishasura, the buffalo demon king emerging from the body of a buffalo (10).
The vestibule ceiling is equally elaborate, featuring two carved panels. One depicts Indra and Indrani riding upon their elephant mount in front of the Varaha panel, while the other shows Vishnu and Lakshmi flying upon Garuda opposite the image of Durga.
Within the sanctuary stands a pedestal supporting a monolithic Shiva linga. The doorway, however, has suffered considerable damage, and its jambs, carved separately from individual stone blocks, now lie collapsed nearby.
Despite the remarkable sophistication of its sculptural programme, Ravana Phadi was never fully completed. The much larger chamber on the right-hand side of the mandapa remains entirely undecorated, its walls still bearing the distinctive scooped extraction marks left by the original quarrying process. These unfinished surfaces provide a rare opportunity to observe the techniques employed by Early Chalukyan craftsmen as they excavated cave temples directly from the living rock.
Although modest in size, Ravana Phadi stands among the most significant monuments at Aihole. It encapsulates a moment of extraordinary artistic experimentation, when sculptors, architects and patrons were redefining the possibilities of rock-cut architecture while laying the foundations for the great structural temples that would follow. Combining technical innovation, refined iconography and exceptional sculptural quality, the cave remains one of the clearest expressions of the creative vitality that made Aihole the cradle of Early Chalukyan architecture and one of the most influential centres in the history of Indian temple design.
Hucchimalli Gudi : An Overlooked Masterpiece of Early Chalukyan Architecture – Aihole
Tucked away among the numerous monuments of Aihole is a temple that is easily overlooked by visitors hurrying between the better-known Durga Temple and Lad Khan Temple. Yet Hucchimalli Gudi is one of the most important buildings in the evolution of Hindu temple architecture. Although modest in size and comparatively restrained in appearance, it marks a significant stage in the development of the structural stone temple, introducing architectural ideas that would become standard features of later temples across southern India.
Dating from the late sixth or early seventh century AD, Hucchimalli Gudi belongs to the formative period of the Early Chalukya dynasty, when architects at Aihole were experimenting with new layouts, superstructures and decorative programmes. The temple reflects a remarkable willingness to innovate, blending elements inherited from earlier rock-cut shrines with ideas that would later reach maturity at Pattadakal.
Dedicated to Shiva, the temple rewards careful study rather than a cursory glance. Its restrained exterior conceals a sophisticated architectural plan, while its sculptures provide valuable insights into the religious and artistic world of the Early Chalukyas. Although it lacks the grandeur of some of Aihole’s larger monuments, Hucchimalli Gudi occupies a pivotal place in the story of Indian temple architecture.
Between the sixth and eighth centuries, Aihole served as one of the principal centres of the Early Chalukya kingdom. During this period the settlement became an architectural laboratory where craftsmen experimented with different temple plans, roof forms and decorative styles before many of these ideas were refined at nearby Pattadakal. The remarkable concentration of over one hundred temples at Aihole illustrates the extraordinary creativity of Chalukyan architects, and Hucchimalli Gudi represents one of the most significant stages in this process of experimentation.
Despite its importance, relatively little is known about the temple’s construction. No foundation inscription survives to identify its patron, and its date has therefore been established through architectural comparison with other Early Chalukyan monuments. Most scholars place it between the late sixth and early seventh century AD, making it broadly contemporary with several of Aihole’s earliest structural temples.
Although no foundation inscription records the temple’s construction, two later inscriptions survive on the façade of the entrance porch. The more important, consisting of five lines, records a grant of oil to the temple priest during the reign of the Early Chalukya king Vijayaditya in A.D. 708, demonstrating that the shrine was already an established place of worship by the early eighth century.
The name Hucchimalli Gudi literally means “Temple of Hucchimalli.” Like many traditional names attached to ancient monuments, its origin is uncertain. One local tradition associates it with a woman named Hucchimalli, while another derives the name from the Kannada word hucchu, meaning “mad” or “eccentric.” Neither explanation can be verified, and the temple’s original historical name has been lost.
The temple was dedicated to Shiva, whose presence is represented by a linga within the sanctum. During the Early Chalukya period, Shaivism enjoyed widespread royal patronage, although the dynasty was notable for its religious tolerance. Temples dedicated to Vishnu, Shiva, Jain tirthankaras and local deities were all constructed at Aihole, reflecting the diverse religious landscape of the Deccan.
Although never among Aihole’s largest monuments, Hucchimalli Gudi became highly influential because of its architectural innovations. It demonstrates the confidence of builders who were moving beyond simple rectangular shrines towards increasingly sophisticated temple plans capable of accommodating both ritual requirements and aesthetic ambition.
Hucchimalli Gudi stands upon a lofty stone plinth about 2.1m high, approached by a flight of eight steps. The plinth itself is carefully decorated, with mouldings at the base and another higher course carved with chaitya-arch motifs enclosing small human figures. This elevated platform gives the temple an impressive presence despite its relatively modest dimensions.
Unlike many of Aihole’s early shrines, the temple faces west. Its plan consists of a mukhamantapa (entrance porch), a sabhamantapa or assembly hall, an antarala (antechamber or vestibule) and a square garbhagriha surrounded by a covered pradakshinapatha (circumambulatory passage). The entrance porch is supported by four plain square pillars lacking bases or carved ornament, while stone benches line its sides. The slabs of these benches are beautifully carved with vase and foliage motifs.
Architecturally, the temple represents a decisive step forward in the evolution of the Hindu temple. Earlier structural temples at Aihole generally led directly from the hall into the sanctum. At Hucchimalli Gudi, however, an antarala appears for the first time, creating an intermediate space between the assembly hall and the shrine. This innovation established the processional sequence that became standard in later South Indian temple architecture and makes the temple one of the most significant monuments in Aihole’s architectural development.
Above the vestibule projects the shukanasa, while the sanctum is crowned by a graceful rekhanagara shikhara. The curving northern-style tower illustrates the Early Chalukyas’ willingness to combine Nagara and Dravida traditions in creating their own distinctive architectural style.
The front of the shikhara contains a beautifully carved panel of Shiva performing the Tandava, one of the temple’s finest surviving sculptures.
Although less profusely ornamented than later Chalukyan monuments, Hucchimalli Gudi possesses a remarkably sophisticated decorative programme.
The entrance doorway is said to be among the finest surviving examples of Early Chalukyan craftsmanship. Multiple bands of floral ornament frame the opening, while graceful pilasters with amalaka capitals flank the outer frame. At the base stand the river goddesses Ganga and Yamuna, attended by companions.
Above the lintel appears an unusual representation of Garuda, shown with outspread wings grasping the tails of two Nagas. The doorway leading into the sabhamantapa echoes many of these decorative motifs, creating visual continuity throughout the temple.
The interior of Hucchimalli Gudi is characterised by a restrained elegance that places emphasis upon architectural space rather than elaborate ornament. The square pillars supporting the sabhamantapa are unusually plain and appear never to have been fully completed. The outlines of medallions can still be seen on their surfaces, suggesting that carving was begun but abandoned before completion.
The hall and the antarala are separated by elegant stone jali screens placed between the rear pillars of the hall. The sanctum itself is almost perfectly square.
The ceilings, however, are among the temple’s finest artistic achievements. The ceiling of the entrance porch displays Kartikeya seated upon his peacock, holding a sword and flower while smiling celestial Gandharvas fly around him bearing garlands.
The ceiling of the antarala is adorned with a finely carved lotus, while the three ceiling bays of the hall combine lotus medallions with sculptural panels depicting Shiva seated upon Nandi, Indra riding Airavata, Vishnu mounted on Garuda, and Brahma seated upon his goose (Hamsa). Decorative cross-beams supported by dwarf figures divide the ceiling bays, while the surrounding entablature alternates chaitya motifs with lively animal carvings.
Light filters through perforated stone windows in the circumambulatory passage, creating a subdued atmosphere around the sanctum. At its centre stands the Shiva linga.
Hucchimalli Gudi should be appreciated not merely as an isolated shrine but as the centrepiece of a larger temple complex. Adjacent to the temple is a large stepped tank that formed part of the ritual complex, supplying water for ceremonial purification before worship.
The sculptural panels now adorning its walls—including depictions of the Dikpalas, Mahishamardini, Brahma, Vishnu, Gajalakshmi, Kartikeya, and narrative scenes from the Panchatantra and the Kiratarjuniya—are not original to the tank itself.
Archaeological evidence indicates that these sculptures were relocated there from another Early Chalukyan monument, making the tank a repository of important sculptural fragments rather than a unified decorative programme.
In front of the main shrine stands the remains of a smaller east-facing temple, of which only the original mukhamantapa survives. Despite its partially ruined and renovated condition, the porch retains an attractive row of finely carved Poornakumbha (overflowing vase) motifs.
To the north is another temple dating to the Kalyana Chalukya period of the eleventh century. Its sanctum is crowned by a phansana (stepped) shikhara, providing an interesting architectural contrast with the earlier rekhanagara tower of Hucchimalli Gudi and illustrating the continuing evolution of temple architecture at Aihole over several centuries. The sanctum is now empty.
Hucchimalli Gudi is a monument whose significance lies not in its size or grandeur but in its innovation. Built at a time when temple architecture in the Deccan was still evolving, it captures the confidence and creativity of Early Chalukyan craftsmen as they experimented with new forms, new spatial arrangements and new architectural ideas. Features that would later become commonplace—including the ardhamandapa, the shukanasa and the enclosed circumambulatory passage—appear here in some of their earliest surviving structural forms.
While larger monuments such as the Durga Temple naturally attract greater attention, Hucchimalli Gudi offers a quieter but no less rewarding encounter with the beginnings of one of India’s greatest architectural traditions.
Chikki Temple Complex – Aihole
Hidden away among the more celebrated monuments of Aihole is one of the village’s finest yet least appreciated temples. The Chikki Temple (often called Chikkigudi) lacks the imposing silhouette of the Durga Temple or the fame of Lad Khan, and its plain exterior gives little indication of the artistic treasures concealed within. Yet for those interested in the development of Indian temple architecture, it is one of Aihole’s most rewarding monuments.
Although modest in scale, the temple represents an important stage in the evolution of Early Chalukyan architecture during the seventh century. Its carefully planned layout, richly ornamented interior, and remarkable sculptural programme demonstrate a considerable advance over earlier temples of the same type. Even more intriguing are the archaeological remains immediately beside it—an unfinished apsidal shrine and fragments of other small sanctuaries, which provide valuable evidence of the experimentation that made Aihole the architectural laboratory of the Early Chalukya dynasty.
The Chikki Temple stands just 200 metres
north-west of Aihole’s main temple complex, immediately east of the road
leading north out of the village. Its secluded location means that many
visitors never discover it, and during my visit it was the only temple
complex in the village with its main gate locked. Fortunately, this
proved to be only a minor obstacle to exploring the site. 
Approaching the temple, one could easily mistake it for a relatively plain structure. Built from the warm red sandstone characteristic of the Malaprabha valley, it has a low, horizontal appearance. Sloping stone roof slabs shelter the exterior, while the mandapa and sanctuary are covered by flat roofing. Compared with the soaring forms of later Chalukyan temples at Pattadakal, the building appears restrained and almost austere.
The Chikki Temple belongs to the remarkable period during which the Early Chalukyas transformed Aihole into one of India’s greatest centres of architectural innovation. Between the sixth and eighth centuries, temple builders experimented constantly with new plans, structural techniques and decorative programmes, adapting ideas from earlier timber buildings, rock-cut shrines and both northern and southern architectural traditions.
The temple belongs to the same architectural family as the nearby Gaudar Gudi, but represents a more mature and carefully conceived development of the type. The plan is more sophisticated, the carving considerably richer, and the integration of sculpture with architecture demonstrates the growing confidence of Chalukyan craftsmen.
Rather than constructing monumental temples alone, the builders at Aihole continually refined architectural ideas through buildings of varying size and complexity. Chikki Temple is one of the finest surviving examples of this experimental approach.
The temple follows a logical and well-balanced arrangement consisting of a pillared entrance porch (mukhamandapa), an enclosed assembly hall (sabhamandapa) and a square sanctum (garbhagriha) surrounded by a circumambulatory passage (pradakshinapatha). In plan it is very similar to Hucchimalli Gudi, 450m to the north-east from here.
Three stone steps lead to the entrance portico, whose simple square pillars support a flat stone ceiling. Their plain appearance prepares the visitor for the increasing richness of the spaces beyond.
Unfortunately, my 2026 visit came to an abrupt end here, as the main temple itself was also locked. Fortunately, I later discovered that I had visited the temple during a brief stop in Aihole back in 2013. Thanks to a handful of photographs I took on that earlier visit, I am still able to describe some of the architectural details and features of its interior.
Passing through the entrance doorway, one enters the main hall, where the architectural character changes dramatically. Here the craftsmen abandoned restraint in favour of an extraordinarily refined decorative programme, producing one of the most elegant interiors in Aihole.
Surrounding the sanctuary is a narrow circumambulatory passage, allowing devotees to perform the ritual act of walking clockwise around the sacred shrine. This feature reflects the growing sophistication of Chalukyan temple planning and distinguishes the Chikki Temple from simpler contemporary shrines.
One of the temple’s most attractive architectural features is the treatment of natural light. The circumambulatory passage is illuminated by large perforated stone windows, or jalis, set into the outer walls on three sides.
These stone screens perform several functions simultaneously. They admit cooling air into the enclosed passage, soften the harsh Deccan sunlight, and create constantly changing patterns of light and shadow across the sandstone walls. The effect transforms what might otherwise have been a dark corridor into an atmospheric sacred space.
The greatest artistic triumph of the Chikki Temple lies in the columns supporting the main hall. Although square at their bases, each shaft develops into an increasingly elaborate composition of carved ornament that demonstrates the exceptional skill of Early Chalukyan sculptors.
Around the middle of each column are elaborate jewelled garlands emerging from the mouths of kirtimukhas, the fierce protective monster faces that frequently appear in Indian temple architecture. These festoons drape elegantly around the shaft, producing a sense of movement despite being carved from solid stone. Between the garlands appear yalis, mythical leonine creatures, ridden by diminutive dwarfs.
The entrance to the sanctum forms one of the architectural highlights of the temple. The richly decorated door jambs are covered with elegant floral ornament. Above the doorway, the lintel is dominated by an unusual image of Garuda, depicted with wings spread while grasping serpent tails in both hands, a symbolic representation of his eternal struggle against the Nagas.
Lower down, three-headed Nagas stand with folded hands in attitudes of devotion, while river goddesses occupy niches on either side of the doorway. Particularly striking are the miniature shrine motifs above the side pilasters, decorated with trefoil chaitya arches. Within them stand the three principal deities; Brahma (left), Shiva (middle), and Vishnu (right).
Within the Sanctum lies a Shiva linga, which would appear to be a relatively recent addition as the sanctum was reported as empty a century ago.
Perhaps the most unexpected feature of the temple is its beautifully carved ceiling. The central ceiling panels are organised around large lotus medallions enclosed within square frames, while the corners contain flying celestial figures or mythical makaras. Surrounding these central compositions are rectangular narrative panels depicting scenes from both Vaishnava and Shaiva mythology.
One panel portrays Vishnu reclining upon the cosmic serpent Ananta, while Lakshmi massages his feet. From Vishnu’s navel rises the lotus upon which Brahma sits, creating the universe. Celestial attendants hover around the divine assembly, completing one of Hindu mythology’s great creation scenes.
Another panel illustrates the story of Trivikrama, the giant cosmic form assumed by Vishnu after appearing before King Bali as a humble dwarf. Having requested only three paces of land, Vishnu expands to universal proportions, covering earth and heaven in two strides before forcing Bali beneath the earth with the third.
The builders devised an ingenious method of illuminating these ceiling sculptures. Above the decorated ceiling slabs rose a superstructure that has largely disappeared. Within its surviving base are four carefully positioned perforations—two facing north and two south—which admitted daylight directly onto the sculptured ceiling below.
Fragments of the surviving masonry suggest that the temple may once have possessed a curvilinear shikhara, although this upper structure has long since collapsed. Even in ruin, however, enough survives to hint at the temple’s original profile.
Immediately south of the Chikki Temple stands another structure that appears to be an unfinished temple. Between the two lie only the stone footings of what were evidently intended to be additional shrines—buildings that, quite literally, never progressed beyond their foundations.
All around the compound are fragments of temple masonry, including large slabs of ceiling with lotus design.
To the north of the Chikki Temple lie the remains of another intriguing monument. Only the basement of a small apsidal-ended shrine survives, together with a reconstructed entrance portal displaying finely carved columns, brackets and lintel.
Towards the apsidal end stands a linga mounted upon a circular pedestal, while a small seated Nandi occupies its customary position facing the shrine. Although little of the original building remains, these fragments help illustrate the variety of temple forms once present within this part of Aihole.
Taken together, these structures leave the impression that the site served as an active centre of architectural experimentation rather than a carefully planned temple complex conceived from the outset. It is also one of the few sites at Aihole that appears to have been left unfinished. Alternatively, if the complex was ever completed, much of it must have been dismantled or destroyed at some later date for reasons that remain unclear. Early photographs and surveys of Aihole indicate that the site has existed in much the same condition since at least the 1870s.
Jyotirlinga Temple Complex – Aihole
The Jyotirlinga Temple Complex comprises a group of sixteen Hindu monuments arranged around a large stepped water tank, an essential ritual and civic feature of the site. It lies to the east of the Durga Temple complex, across the road, and 250m south of the Ravana Phadi Cave.
Dedicated primarily to Shiva, the complex consists mostly of small to medium-sized shrines built mainly during the 7th and 8th centuries under the Early Chalukyas, with later additions and alterations during the Rashtrakuta period in the 8th and 9th centuries. Despite its fragmentary state, the complex provides valuable insight into the evolution of temple architecture and Shaivite worship at Aihole.
Main Temple (Temple 1)
The principal shrine of the Jyotirlinga Temple Complex is situated at the far north of the complex, and stands on a high plinth facing east. It is distinguished by a well-developed mukhamandapa (entrance hall) supported by eight square pillars with two-faced capitals. In each row, the two central pillars are set unusually close together, creating a focal space occupied by a large seated Nandi, facing the shrine’s linga.
The entrance hall measures approximately 3.65m x 6.2m and is covered by a flat roof. Access is gained by a short flight of four steps on the south side.
Beyond the entrance is the sabhamandapa (assembly hall), entered through a plain doorway. The hall measures about 5.4m × 5.7m and is divided into a central nave with side aisles by two rows of square pillars, each topped with two-faced capitals. The roof is flat throughout.
The shrine doorway is also plain, with an undecorated dedicatory panel above the lintel. Several loose sculptures reside within the hall, including Ganesha, a stylised lion, and a Matrika panel (with Ganesha and Virabhadra, often included in such panels, notably absent). These are all heavily weathered.
To the east and south of Temple 1 are a number of ruined structures, small shrines and Nandi mandapas.
Stepped Tank
At the far eastern extent of the temple complex is a substantial stepped tank. The main body of the tank resides immediately east of Temple 1 and extends south to the entrance of Temple 2.
Temple 2
Another important shrine within the complex faces north. Like the main temple, it possesses a substantial mukhamandapa, regarded as one of the most fully developed examples at Aihole.
Its most distinctive feature is the series of stone bench-seats built on a low plinth around all four sides of the entrance hall, projecting slightly outwards. These benches are richly carved with lotus medallions, vase and foliage motifs, and figures of deities.
The entrance hall is supported by sixteen pillars. Twelve are incorporated into the stone benches and have square bases that transition into rounded and then octagonal shafts, terminating in moulded necks and two- or three-faced capitals. Four additional pillars stand on a slightly raised platform. These are more elaborate, with moulded bases, octagonal shafts decorated with three horizontal bands, box-like elements, circular upper members, and large abaci supporting three-faced capitals.
The portico, measuring approximately 4.9m square, has entrances on the north, east, and west. It opens into an antarala (antechamber) about 2.6m x 2.1m. Above the shrine doorway is a sculpture of Gajalakshmi, while decorative pilasters flank the entrance. The roof of the antechamber has not survived at all.
The square shrine measures roughly 2.1m square and houses a Shiva linga, the one we see today is not the original linga as it was reported missing in the 19th century. Unfortunately, the sanctum walls and roof have almost entirely disappeared.
Temple 3
A third shrine in the complex faces east. Its entrance porch has been destroyed, and the present four-step approach is a modern reconstruction.
The richly ornamented entrance doorway also appears to be a later addition. Above the lintel is an attractive sculpture of Gajalakshmi, accompanied by the customary pair of elephants.
The assembly hall measures approximately 4.8m x 4.5m. Its roof was supported by four central pillars, together with two pillars of the antechamber and two entrance pilasters. An additional eight wall pilasters once helped carry the roof but have since been lost. The first pillar on the left bears a seven-line Kannada inscription. Unfortunately on my visit a caretaker was sleeping here, I decided it was best not to disturb him.
The sanctuary was crowned by a stepped pyramidal shikhara, although much of this superstructure has been reconstructed from it’s ruined state as reported in the 19th century.
Temple 4
This east-facing Shiva temple has received no attention at all by academics that I can find. In many respects it’s a shortened version of Temple 1, but here the Nandi shelters under it’s own mandapa directly attached to the mukhamandapa (entrance hall).
Although much of the Jyotirlinga Temple Complex now lies in ruins, the surviving temples, carved pillars, Nandi mandapas and stepped tank offer a quiet reminder of the site’s architectural and religious importance during the Early Chalukya and later Rashtrakuta periods.
Two-Storeyed Buddhist Monastery – Aihole
Hidden away on the slopes of Meguti Hill is one of Aihole’s least visited yet most remarkable monuments. While the village is celebrated for its Early Chalukyan Hindu and Jain temples, it also preserves the only known Buddhist monument at the site—a two-storeyed monastery and shrine carved partly into the living rock.
The monument lies a short distance below the famous Meguti Jain Temple and commands fine views across the Malaprabha valley towards Pattadakal. Although modest in size, it provides rare evidence for the presence of a Buddhist community at Aihole during the formative years of Early Chalukyan rule. Its unique combination of structural masonry and rock-cut architecture also makes it unlike any other monument in the village.
When British archaeologist Henry Cousens surveyed Aihole in the late nineteenth century, he described the monument as “a curious two-storeyed temple” and identified it as Jain. This was an understandable mistake. The monastery stands on Meguti Hill immediately below the Jain temple, and the principal sculpture is sheltered beneath a triple parasol, a motif found in both Buddhist and Jain art.
Cousens also misunderstood the building’s internal arrangement, believing that the three shrine chambers were located on the upper floor. Later research showed that these chambers are in fact on the lower level, while the upper storey contains only a single sanctuary.
Subsequent study of the monument’s sculpture, doorway carvings and inscriptions demonstrated that the building is unquestionably Buddhist. Today it is recognised as the only surviving Buddhist monument at Aihole and one of very few Early Buddhist remains in northern Karnataka.
The monastery occupies a natural sandstone outcrop on the hillside. Rather than being entirely excavated like the cave temples at nearby Badami, it combines rock-cut chambers with structural masonry, creating a building that is literally half cave and half temple.
The façade consists of two open verandahs, one above the other, each supported by four heavy square pillars with matching pilasters built into the side walls. Much of the rear of the monument is cut directly into the projecting boulder behind it, while the front is constructed from dressed stone blocks.
The flight of stairs on the right continues the path up to Meguti Jain Temple
The entire structure rises to a height of approximately 7.5 metres. The lower level consists of a long open verandah leading to a narrow passage, from which three rock-cut chambers open. The central chamber is larger than the two flanking cells, suggesting that it served as the principal shrine or assembly room.
Unlike Hindu cave temples, these chambers contain no sculptured deities. Instead, each preserves simple rock-cut beds with raised backrests. These were almost certainly used by monks for meditation, study and sleep, confirming that the building functioned as a vihara—a Buddhist monastery—as well as a place of worship.
The entrance to the central chamber is the most elaborately decorated doorway in the monument. Although much of the carving has suffered from centuries of weathering, the doorjambs still preserve floral scrolls, creepers and mithuna (loving) couples at their bases. Particularly significant are a series of small narrative carvings illustrating episodes from the life of the Buddha, one of the strongest pieces of evidence confirming the Buddhist identity of the monument.
An external flight of steps leads to the upper level. Here another open verandah, again supported by four square pillars, gives access to a single sanctuary excavated into the rock.
The doorway is comparatively plain, although traces of decorative chaitya-window motifs survive above the lintel. The sanctuary itself is empty today, but the verandah ceiling in front of the sanctuary doorway preserves the monument’s most important work of art.
Carved in high relief is a seated Buddha beneath a triple parasol. He sits cross-legged upon a lotus with a halo behind his head. His right hand is raised in vitarka mudra, the gesture of teaching, while his left rests in dhyana mudra, symbolising meditation. Despite damage to the surrounding figures, the Buddha himself remains remarkably well preserved.
Early scholars mistakenly identified this figure as a seated Jain Tirthankara, largely because of the triple umbrella above his head. Later study showed that every aspect of the sculpture—including the robes, posture and associated reliefs—is unmistakably Buddhist.
Visitors approaching the monastery will notice a headless stone Buddha lying outside the entrance. This damaged image probably once stood within the shrine before being removed at some unknown date.
A second Buddha image associated with the monastery has since been transferred to the Aihole Site Museum for protection.
This is now located at Aihole Museum, although the accompanying label makes no reference to its original location
The rock-cut Buddha relief inside the upper shrine, however, remains in its original position. It is this sculpture that forms the spiritual and artistic focus of the entire monument.
Although Buddhism never flourished at Aihole to the same extent as Hinduism or Jainism, this remarkable relief demonstrates that a thriving Buddhist community once existed here, leaving behind one of the most unusual monuments in the Early Chalukyan capital.
Several inscriptions have been discovered on and around the monastery, although none is dated. Their palaeography suggests they belong broadly between the sixth and eighth centuries CE. One inscription is of particular importance, mentioning a monk named Mahendra, a disciple of Ānanda Sthāvira of the Pindavadi Buddhist school.
The Pindavadi sect is known from inscriptions of the Vishnukundin dynasty, which ruled parts of the Deccan during the fifth century. This has led some scholars to suggest that the monastery may have originated in the late fifth or early sixth century, making it one of the earliest religious monuments at Aihole and perhaps predating the majority of the Early Chalukyan temples.
Not all researchers accept such an early date, however. Architecturally, the monastery shares several features with Early Chalukyan monuments, including its square pillars, bracket capitals and decorative medallions. Most scholars therefore favour a construction date in the late sixth century, during the formative years of Chalukyan rule, while acknowledging that an earlier origin cannot be ruled out.
Whatever its precise date, the monastery is one of the earliest surviving Buddhist monuments in Karnataka and provides valuable evidence that Buddhist communities continued to flourish in the Deccan alongside the growing patronage of Hindu and Jain institutions.
The monastery did not remain an active Buddhist establishment indefinitely. As Buddhism gradually declined in the region and royal patronage shifted towards Hinduism and Jainism, the resident monks eventually abandoned the site.
The building, however, continued to serve a practical purpose. Numerous inscriptions scratched onto the pillars and walls record the names of craftsmen, sculptors and builders who later occupied the monument. These include Binjadi Ovajan, one of the most celebrated architects of the Early Chalukya period, and Narasobba, the master builder traditionally associated with the nearby Huccappayyagudi Temple.
These graffiti provide a fascinating glimpse into everyday life at Aihole during its greatest period of temple building. The former monastery appears to have become a convenient shelter or resting place for artisans employed throughout the village. In effect, a secluded Buddhist vihara was transformed into a communal lodging for the craftsmen responsible for many of Aihole’s finest temples.
Evidence of this later reuse can also be seen in repairs to the structure. Parts of the side walls were rebuilt using reused stone blocks, including fragments from other monuments, demonstrating that the building continued to evolve long after its original religious function had ended.
The Buddhist monastery on Meguti Hill occupies a unique place in Aihole’s history. It is the only surviving Buddhist monument in a settlement otherwise renowned for its Hindu and Jain architecture, and it offers a rare insight into the religious diversity of the Early Chalukyan capital.
Its architectural form is equally distinctive. Partly excavated from the hillside and partly constructed in masonry, it bridges the traditions of the rock-cut monasteries of the western Deccan and the structural temples that would soon dominate Chalukyan architecture. The simple monks’ cells, rock-cut beds and carved Buddha relief reveal a functional monastery rather than a grand ceremonial temple, making the monument all the more valuable as evidence for everyday Buddhist life.
Although overshadowed by the magnificent temples elsewhere in Aihole, the monastery preserves an important chapter in the region’s religious history. It reminds us that Buddhism continued to play a role in the Deccan during the sixth century, even as Hindu temple architecture entered its most creative period.
Today, visitors climbing Meguti Hill often pause at the Jain temple before continuing to the summit. A short detour to this quiet monastery is well worthwhile. Its weathered pillars, rock-cut chambers and serene Buddha relief tell the story of a forgotten Buddhist community whose presence would otherwise have been almost entirely lost from Aihole’s remarkable architectural landscape.
Meguti Jain Temple – Aihole
Perched high on a rocky hill overlooking the ancient settlement of Aihole, the Meguti Jain Temple occupies a unique place in the history of Indian architecture. Unlike the richly ornamented shrines that surround it, Meguti is a monument of quiet dignity. Its plain sandstone walls and restrained decoration conceal an extraordinary historical significance, for this is one of the earliest surviving structural Jain temples in Karnataka and one of the most important dated monuments of early medieval India. It was here, in 634–635 CE (Śaka 556), that the celebrated court poet Ravikirti composed and engraved the famous Aihole Prashasti, an inscription that established the chronology of the Early Chalukya dynasty and provided one of the earliest datable references to the great Sanskrit poets Kālidāsa and Bhāravi.
For archaeologists, historians and students of Indian architecture, the Meguti Temple is far more than a religious monument. It represents the culmination of the remarkable architectural experimentation that transformed Aihole into what is often described as the “Cradle of Indian Temple Architecture.” Here, on a commanding hilltop overlooking the Malaprabha Valley, architecture, religion, literature and political history converge in a single monument of exceptional importance.
Beyond the walled enclosure are views down to Aihole village and temples
The name Meguti is generally accepted to derive from the Kannada Melu-gudi, meaning “upper temple” or “temple on the hill,” a description first noted by Henry Cousens during his survey of Chalukyan architecture in the late nineteenth century. The temple stands upon the summit of Meguti Hill, enclosed within the ancient fortifications that once protected this elevated plateau. Its position is strikingly different from most of Aihole’s temples, which occupy the streets and open spaces below. The choice of such a prominent location was undoubtedly symbolic, proclaiming the prestige of the Jain community while also taking advantage of the hill’s commanding defensive position.
Ms Sarah Welch, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
The ascent is rewarded by panoramic views across the entire temple complex of Aihole. From the summit, you can appreciate the extraordinary density of Early Chalukya monuments scattered across the landscape—the Durga Temple, Lad Khan Temple, Huchimalli Temple and dozens of lesser shrines stretching across nearly three square miles. The elevated perspective reinforces the impression that Aihole was not simply a city of temples, but an architectural laboratory in which new structural forms were continually tested before reaching their mature expression at nearby Pattadakal. Anyone making the ascent of Meguti Hill to visit this remarkable temple should also set aside time to explore the two-storeyed Buddhist monastery situated beside the flight of steps that leads from Aihole village towards the hilltop. Often overlooked by visitors as it is somewhat detached from the main cluster of temples, this fascinating monument provides an additional glimpse into the diverse religious traditions that flourished at Aihole during the early medieval period.
The Meguti temple belongs to the reign of the illustrious Chalukya emperor Pulakeshin II (who reigned circa 610–642 CE), whose kingdom extended across much of the Deccan during the seventh century. Under his rule the Western Chalukya Empire reached the height of its political power, successfully resisting the north Indian emperor Harsha while extending its influence deep into southern India.
Although the Meguti Temple is often described as austere, closer examination reveals a carefully considered decorative programme that reflects the mature craftsmanship of Early Chalukya sculptors. Rather than covering every available surface with ornament, as became common in later centuries, the builders concentrated their embellishment on selected architectural elements. This restrained approach gives the temple an air of monumental simplicity, allowing its proportions and masonry to dominate the visual experience.
The temple stands upon a high moulded plinth and, unusually for an Indian temple, faces north. The exterior walls are largely plain, their broad sandstone surfaces interrupted only by a series of image niches framed by pilasters with three-sided capitals. Many of these niches are now empty, yet they clearly indicate that sculptural images were intended to enliven the otherwise unadorned façades. Above them runs a projecting cornice decorated with chaitya arches.
The plinth itself is enriched with mouldings that include miniature chaitya arches enclosing human heads, while below these are tiny shrine-like niches containing diminutive figures. Rows horseshoe-shaped motifs, inherited from earlier rock-cut architecture, decorate the mouldings between the plinth and the parapet wall of the porch.
A broad flight of steps ascends to a spacious mukhamandapa (pillared entrance hall), measuring approximately 5.9m in length.
Larger than any comparable porch at Aihole, it is supported by sixteen plain square pillars crowned with simple three-sided capitals. The absence of elaborate carving lends the hall an austere dignity that contrasts sharply with the more ornate temples built later at Pattadakal.
Beyond the porch lies the antarala, or vestibule, which is divided into two compartments by an intervening wall. A short flight of steps leads to a smaller inner antechamber supported by four pilasters before a doorway opens into the pradakshinapatha, the circumambulatory passage surrounding the sanctum.
The shrine itself occupies the centre of a large square hall measuring approximately 8.7m square. Numerous cross walls and pilasters subdivide the surrounding passage into a series of smaller chambers. Although intended for ritual circumambulation, the passage no longer serves that purpose because a later cross wall completely blocks its rear section, an alteration almost certainly introduced sometime after the original construction.
Within the sanctum stands a simply carved and relatively crude image of a Jain Tirthankara, generally identified as Mahavira, placed upon a rectangular stone pedestal close to the rear wall. The light within the sanctum was so dim that it was difficult to make out any detail. It was only after returning home and examining my photographs that I was able to appreciate the carved image properly. Even then, it is difficult to determine whether the carving was left unfinished or whether its present appearance is the result of later damage.
Far more accomplished (and better preserved) is the magnificent sculptured slab depicting Kushmandi, the mother goddess in Jain religion, originally found at this temple and now preserved in the archaeological museum at Aihole.
This Meguti sculpture is widely regarded as one of the finest examples of Early Chalukya artistry. The sculptor’s confident modelling of the female form, delicate treatment of drapery and balanced composition reveal an artistic sophistication that belies the apparent simplicity of the temple itself.
One of Meguti’s most remarkable features is its upper storey, accessed by a stone staircase rising from the pillared porch. Above the principal sanctum stands a second shrine. Although the shikhara above has largely collapsed, the surviving remains suggest it was long and rectangular in form, reflecting an experimental stage in the development of multi-storeyed temple architecture. Such arrangements remained rare during the seventh century, making Meguti an invaluable witness to the architectural innovations that characterised Early Chalukya building.
An enduring mystery surrounding the Meguti Temple is whether it was ever completed. Throughout the structure there is compelling evidence that construction ceased before the original decorative programme had been finished. Most image niches remain empty, carving was abandoned on surfaces that had clearly been prepared for ornament, and numerous blocks still bear the rough tooling marks left by the masons before final dressing. The contrast between the finely finished structural masonry and the absence of extensive sculptural decoration suggests that work was interrupted.
The reasons for this remain uncertain. One possibility is that construction was halted following the disastrous Pallava invasion of Vatapi (Badami) in 642 CE, during which Pulakeshin II is believed to have been killed and the Chalukya capital temporarily occupied. Such political upheaval would almost certainly have disrupted major building projects throughout the kingdom. Another interpretation proposes that the temple had already fulfilled its principal ceremonial function once Ravikirti’s inscription had been installed, reducing the urgency of completing the decorative programme.
The Meguti Temple is closely associated with Ravikirti, a distinguished Jain scholar, poet and minister at the court of the Early Chalukya ruler Pulakeshin II. A highly accomplished literary figure, Ravikirti composed the celebrated Aihole Prashasti, an elegant Sanskrit inscription that was engraved upon a large stone slab fixed to the eastern wall of the temple. Written in early Chalukyan script, this remarkable inscription is far more than a conventional royal eulogy; it is one of the most important historical documents to survive from early medieval India.
The inscription provides historians with an invaluable record of the Early Chalukya dynasty, preserving the genealogy of its rulers and documenting the achievements and military campaigns of Pulakeshin II. Most importantly, it provides a secure date for the construction of the temple: Śaka 556, corresponding to 634–635 CE. This precise chronological reference makes the Meguti Prashasti exceptionally significant, as relatively few monuments from early medieval India possess inscriptions that can be dated with such certainty. As a result, it has become one of the cornerstones for reconstructing the political and cultural chronology of seventh-century India.
Among the most celebrated events recorded in the inscription is Pulakeshin II’s victory over the powerful north Indian emperor Harsha, a triumph that established the Chalukya ruler as one of the most formidable monarchs of his age. Through its account of Pulakeshin’s achievements, the inscription provides not only a record of royal ambition but also an essential source for understanding the political landscape of early medieval India.
The Meguti Prashasti also possesses exceptional literary importance. It contains one of the earliest securely dated references to the renowned Sanskrit poets Kālidāsa and Bhāravi, confirming that both had flourished before the middle of the seventh century. This reference has been of immense value to historians and literary scholars in establishing the chronology of classical Sanskrit literature.
The inscription also offers important insights into the religious and cultural environment of the Early Chalukya court. Although Pulakeshin II was a Hindu ruler whose personal devotion was primarily aligned with Brahmanical traditions, he extended generous patronage to Ravikirti, a Jain scholar who constructed a temple dedicated to his own faith. This act of royal support reflects the remarkable religious tolerance of the Early Chalukya kingdom, where patronage often transcended sectarian boundaries.
For those interested in consulting the English translation of the inscription, I have reproduced it below. The translation is provided as a JPG image, which can be viewed or downloaded and enlarged for easier reading, as the full text is quite lengthy.
The significance of Meguti Hill extends far beyond the seventh century. Behind the temple lie numerous prehistoric megalithic dolmens, burial monuments that predate the Chalukya period by many centuries. These stone-built tombs demonstrate that the hill had already acquired ritual importance long before the construction of the Jain temple.
The coexistence of prehistoric burials and an early medieval place of worship illustrates a phenomenon observed across southern India, where successive cultures repeatedly selected prominent natural landmarks for religious and ceremonial purposes. Rather than representing isolated episodes of occupation, Meguti Hill embodies a remarkable continuity of sacred landscape extending over more than a millennium.
For any visitor, Meguti offers magnificent views over one of India’s greatest temple landscapes. For students of archaeology and history, however, it is something far more profound: a monument that anchors the chronology of an empire, illuminates the evolution of Indian temple architecture and preserves tangible evidence of a sacred landscape whose origins reach back into prehistory. Few monuments encapsulate so many strands of India’s cultural heritage within a single structure. Standing above the temples of Aihole after nearly fourteen centuries, the Meguti Jain Temple remains one of the defining achievements of the Early Chalukya age and an indispensable landmark in the story of Indian architecture.
Charanthi Matha: The Jain Temples of Murphadryavar Gudi, Aihole
Among the many monuments scattered across Aihole, the Charanthi Matha Jain group, also known as Murphadryavar Gudi, is perhaps one of the least appreciated. Almost completely obscured by later structures within the village, it belongs to the later phase of Aihole’s architectural history and demonstrates how Jain temple architecture had developed by the time of the Later Chalukyas. The complex consists of three Jain temples, incorporating both conventional shrine architecture and a more unusual arrangement of twin temples sharing a common veranda. It is generally dated to the 12th century, with an inscription traditionally associated with the complex giving a date of 1120 CE.
A matha was not necessarily simply a temple but could also denote a religious establishment associated with teaching, residence and the activities of a religious community. In the Charanthi complex, the combination of multiple shrines and a shared architectural space gives the group something of an institutional character. The two south-facing temples, in particular, have been described as resembling monastic sanctuaries.
The principal temple faces north and is the most architecturally elaborate of the group. Its plan consists of a portico, main hall or mandapa, antarala and sanctum, with two subsidiary shrines attached to its eastern and western sides. The arrangement can therefore be understood as a form of trikuta or three-shrine composition, although the principal shrine is distinguished by its orientation and greater architectural prominence. Unfortunately on my visit this temple was locked.
The portico measures approximately 2.2m x 4.9m. It is supported by two pillars and two pilasters. The pillars have square bases and rounded shafts, followed by the familiar circular mouldings and two-sided capitals characteristic of Chalukyan architectue. The roof is formed from large, flat stone slabs, giving the porch a particularly solid and somewhat austere appearance.
The entrance into the main hall immediately establishes the Jain identity of the monument. On the dedicatory block is an image of Mahavira accompanied by two attendants, while the two pilasters flanking the doorway carry vase and foliage motif that occurs widely in Indian temple architecture. Here, as elsewhere at Aihole, Jain architectural patronage did not require the abandonment of the established decorative vocabulary of the wider Chalukyan tradition.
The main hall measures approximately 5.2m x 4.9m, and is supported by four substantial central pillars arranged in a square, together with twelve pilasters incorporated into the surrounding walls. The four central pillars stand upon a slightly raised platform.
The entrance to the antarala, or vestibule, is again marked by Mahavira. Here he is shown seated upon a lion throne, accompanied by two chauri-bearing attendants. The doorway itself is richly decorated, with floral ornament and numerous small sculptural figures incorporated into the jambs and surrounding pilasters. The antarala measures approximately 2.6m x 2.4m, forming a compact transitional chamber between the mandapa and the sanctum.
The sanctum is entered through another elaborately treated doorway, whose dedicatory sculpture again depicts Mahavira seated upon a lion throne. He sits in padmasana, with his hands held in the dhyana-mudra, the gesture of meditation. Above his head is a triple umbrella, or trichhatra, a conventional emblem of spiritual eminence. The sanctum itself is relatively small, measuring approximately 2.1m x 1.4m.
The principal temple is flanked by two smaller shrines, one on the east and one on the west. Together they create the distinctive three-shrine composition that gives the building much of its architectural character.
The eastern shrine consists of a portico supported by four pillars, followed by an antechamber and sanctum. The dedicatory block of the antechamber again bears an image of Mahavira accompanied by two chauri-bearers.
The western shrine follows a similar arrangement. Its antechamber carries another image of Mahavira, while the shrine doorway has Mahavira seated beneath a triple umbrella and accompanied by attendants. The consistency of the iconographic programme across all three shrines leaves little doubt that the complex was conceived as a unified Jain foundation.
The second part of the Charanthi Matha complex is particularly unusual. Here, two temples face south and share a common veranda. Rather than presenting three independent buildings, the arrangement gives the impression of a unified architectural establishment.
The common veranda measures approximately 11m x 2m and has a façade supported by five highly ornamental pillars and two pilasters. At either end of the veranda are elaborately decorated entrances leading into the respective sabhamandapas.
Each mandapa contains four central pillars arranged in a square, closely resembling those of the principal temple. From each hall, the visitor proceeds towards a separate shrine.
The temple on the left has an especially elaborate entrance. Its dedicatory block depicts Mahavira within a miniature temple-like architectural frame. The roof of this miniature shrine is supported by six yali figures—mythical leonine creatures that are among the most characteristic decorative motifs of South Indian temple architecture.
Above the lintel is a remarkable collection of miniature shikharas. Five are of stepped pyramidal form, while four are curvilinear. Their juxtaposition is noteworthy because it demonstrates the coexistence of different architectural traditions within the decorative programme. Aihole had long been a centre for architectural experimentation, and the Charanthi Matha monuments demonstrate that this eclecticism continued into the Later Chalukyan period.
Above these miniature towers are further images of Jinas, accompanied by attendant figures. The door-jambs are densely carved with floral ornament, miniature human figures and animals, while yalis emerge from the pilasters framing the doorway.
The mandapa itself measures approximately 4.9m x 5m. Its four central pillars resemble those of the principal temple, providing a visual connection between the two parts of the complex.
The entrance to its sanctum repeats the iconographic formula: Mahavira appears on the dedicatory block, enclosed within a miniature temple. Above him are additional miniature stepped shikharas. The doorway is richly ornamented, although the sanctum itself, approximately 1.7m x 1.5m, is now without its principal image.
The second southern temple is similar in general conception. It shares the common veranda and possesses a flat roof constructed in three successive courses of stone. This relatively restrained treatment contrasts with the elaborate sculptural decoration of the doorways and pillars.
Together, the two southern shrines are particularly important because they give the complex something beyond the conventional arrangement of an individual Jain temple. They resemble a paired monastic or institutional sanctuary, with a shared entrance space providing access to two independent sacred chambers. Modern descriptions similarly characterise these buildings as having a monastic appearance.
The complex has traditionally been described as consisting of twin temples, each associated with images of the Jain Tirthankaras. One account records that each contained twelve Tirthankara images, while an inscription associated with the complex is reported to date its construction to 1120 CE.
The Charanthi Matha complex is much more than a collection of three small Jain temples. It represents an important late stage in the architectural history of Aihole, when the experimental traditions established centuries earlier had developed into a sophisticated and highly ornamental architectural language. It is also a reminder that Aihole was never exclusively a Hindu architectural centre. Jain communities were active here over many centuries, producing monuments ranging from the early Jain cave and Meguti temple to the later Yoginarayana and Charanthi Matha groups.
Aralibasappa (Basavanna) Temple – Aihole
Aihole is so closely associated with the Early Chalukyas that it is easy to forget that the settlement continued to be an important religious centre long after their power had faded. The great experimental phase of temple building during the sixth, seventh and early eighth centuries dominates almost every account of the site, and understandably so. Yet scattered amongst those better-known monuments are several later structures that tell us something about Aihole after the fall of the Badami Chalukyas. One such monument is the Aralibasappa Temple, also known as the Basavanna Temple.
Architecturally it is quite modest, there is no spectacular tower, no extensive sculptural programme across the outer walls and no dramatic setting. At first glance, it is one of those buildings that the casual explorer could easily overlook.
But Aralibasappa is significant precisely because it belongs to a different chapter in Aihole’s history. The temple is generally attributed to the Rashtrakuta period and probably dates to around the ninth century CE. This dating is primarily stylistic rather than based upon a surviving foundation inscription. Nevertheless, specialist studies of Rashtrakuta architecture place Aralibasappa among the temples that demonstrate continued building activity at Aihole after the collapse of Early Chalukya power in the middle of the eighth century.
A Temple from Later Aihole
The Rashtrakutas emerged as the dominant political power of the Deccan during the eighth century, replacing the Badami Chalukyas and establishing an empire that extended across large parts of western and central India.
Their greatest architectural achievement is, of course, the extraordinary Kailasanatha Temple at Ellora, excavated from living rock during the eighth century. Compared with that astonishing monument, the Aralibasappa Temple could scarcely be more restrained.
Aralibasappa demonstrates that Rashtrakuta architecture was not confined to monumental royal projects. At older religious centres such as Aihole, temple building continued on a much smaller scale, often drawing upon architectural traditions that had already been established in the region.
The temple consists essentially of a sanctum, or garbhagriha, fronted by an enclosed mandapa. Externally the building is comparatively plain. The walls are solid and largely unadorned, lacking the increasingly complex projections, niches and sculptural programmes that would come to characterise later medieval temple architecture in Karnataka.
The central portion of the mandapa is covered by a raised rectangular flat roof, while the spaces on either side are roofed with sloping stone slabs. The result recalls architectural solutions already employed at Aihole during the Early Chalukya period. Within the sanctum is a black Shiva linga.
The Entrance
Almost all of the temple’s decorative emphasis is concentrated around the doorway leading into the mandapa. Here the architecture suddenly becomes far more elaborate.
The entrance is crowned by a makara-torana, an ornamental arch incorporating makaras, the fantastic aquatic creatures so frequently encountered in Indian temple sculpture. Their hybrid bodies, combining elements of crocodiles, elephants, fish and other animals, made them powerful symbols of water, fertility and abundance.
Below the torana, the doorway is flanked by the river goddesses Ganga and Yamuna. Ganga is usually identified by her association with the makara, while Yamuna is conventionally accompanied by a tortoise.
The lower portions of the jambs have carvings of Shankhanidhi, Padmanidhi, elephants and purna-kalashas – overflowing vessels symbolising fertility.
A Graceful Female Figure
The female figure standing to the left of the doorway has attracted scholarly attention because her pose can be interpreted using terminology preserved in classical Indian texts on performance and movement.
She stands in an elegant posture with the body gently displaced at the hip, producing the familiar sinuous movement found in so much early medieval Indian sculpture. One hand holds a lotus while the other rests gracefully against the surrounding architectural framework.
Her pose has been identified in relation to the vocabulary of the Natya Shastra, the ancient Indian treatise concerned with drama, movement, gesture and performance. Whether the sculptor was consciously following such prescriptions cannot easily be proved, but the comparison is revealing.
Figures such as this are sometimes loosely described as dancers, attendants or surasundaris. In reality their poses frequently belong to a sophisticated visual language in which movement, beauty and auspiciousness were closely connected.
Conservation and Reconstruction
The temple has also undergone substantial conservation work during the modern period. The Archaeological Survey of India reports from the early twenty-first century record extensive intervention around the complex, particularly involving a subsidiary shrine and associated architectural elements.
During work carried out in the 2000s, portions of the subsidiary structure were dismantled and reconstructed. Original architectural members were reused wherever possible, while newly dressed stone was introduced where ancient components were missing or unsuitable for reuse. Later conservation campaigns involved resetting displaced roof slabs, lintels, capitals, pillars and door jambs.
As with many monuments at Aihole, the present appearance is partly the result of modern archaeological conservation.
The Aralibasappa (Basavanna) Temple reminds us that Aihole was not frozen in time at the end of the Early Chalukya period. Temples continued to be built here under new political powers, and older architectural traditions remained sufficiently strong to influence the work of later builders.
Aralibasappa therefore represents continuity. Its ninth-century builders inherited an architectural landscape already crowded with temples, shrines and sacred spaces that had accumulated over several centuries. Rather than abandoning those traditions, they adapted them. The result is a modest building with plain walls and conservative roofing, yet one whose entrance is filled with carefully chosen religious symbolism.
Note : On Google Maps this temple is incorrectly marked as “Ancient Hucchayappa Temple, Aihole”. Both Hucchayappa Gudi and Hucchayappa Matha are located elsewhere in Aihole.
Hucchappayya Matha – Aihole
Among the many Early Chalukyan monuments scattered throughout Aihole, Hucchappayya Matha stands away from the principal concentration of monuments around the Durga Temple complex. Close to the southern edge of the village, it lacks the instantly recognisable silhouette of some of Aihole’s better-known temples. Yet once you start examining the building closely, it becomes one of the most rewarding monuments at the site.
Its relatively restrained architecture conceals an extraordinary collection of sculpture. The pillars are crowded with beautifully carved couples, ascetics and supernatural beings, including some wonderfully strange horse-headed kinnarīs, while overhead are some of the finest surviving sculptured ceilings at Aihole. The result is a building in which the sacred, the sensual and the frankly sometimes humorous exist side by side.
The monument is generally assigned to the later phase of Early Chalukyan building at Aihole, broadly within the 7th–8th centuries CE. Architecturally it belongs to that period when the builders of Aihole were still experimenting with how the different components of a structural Hindu temple should be arranged and articulated.
Matha or Temple?
The name can initially be confusing, particularly because a completely separate monument called Hucchappayya Gudi survives a short distance away towards the Malaprabha river. The two should not be confused.
Hucchappayya Gudi is the monument associated with the celebrated architect and sculptor Narasobba, whose inscription boasts that no expert equal to him in the construction of buildings and temples had existed before, nor would one exist in the future. Hucchappayya Matha is a different complex nearer the village. Both monuments acquired essentially the same modern name, which has resulted in a great deal of confusion in guidebooks, websites and even photographic captions.
The Archaeological Survey of India lists Hucchappayya Matha as a protected Monument of National Importance, and government records indicate that the protected complex actually incorporates two structures. The principal monument is unquestionably a Shiva temple, while the accompanying building is generally interpreted as the matha, or monastic component, from which the complex takes its present name.
Whether the word matha accurately describes the original Early Chalukyan function of the whole complex is less certain. As with several monuments at Aihole, the name by which it is known today need not be the name used when it was constructed.
Architecture
Modified plan originally published by R.S.Gupte in The Art and Architecture of Aihole (1967)
The temple is entered from the east. Compared with the elaborate projections and increasingly complex plans seen in later Chalukyan temples, the arrangement is quite straightforward.
The building consists essentially of a rectangular sabhāmaṇḍapa, or assembly hall, leading to a rectangular sanctum. Inside the hall, two parallel rows of supports create a broad central nave with narrower aisles on either side. Six pillars and two pilasters carry the ceiling. Placed between the four central pillars is a Nandi, facing directly towards the sanctum and the Shiva linga within.
The entrance into the hall is particularly elegant, with the doorway flanked by the river goddesses Gaṅgā and Yamunā, These finely modelled figures are among the more refined pieces of sculpture in the complex.
From a distance the architecture does not necessarily suggest the quality of what survives within. That is one of the pleasures of Hucchappayya Matha: the real spectacle begins only once you reach the pillars and look upwards.
The Pillar Sculptures
The outer pillars and façade contain a wonderful sequence of human figures and amorous couples. Erotic imagery is hardly unusual in Indian temple architecture, and Aihole contains numerous examples, but the carvings at Hucchappayya Matha are unusually lively.
These are not stiff, formulaic pairs standing politely beside one another. Lovers embrace, lean into each other and twist their bodies into complicated poses. Some scenes possess almost an unmistakable sense of humour.
There’s one particular enthusiastic couple in which the male’s head is turned into such an improbable position that it’s been compared to a dislocation ! The woman has placed her hands upon his crown while he pulls her towards himself and raises one of her legs to his waist. The sculptor has transformed what could have been a conventional auspicious mithuna into something much more animated and human.
The Early Chalukyan sculptors were clearly interested in bodies, attraction and human behaviour, and several scenes seem deliberately playful. That playfulness becomes considerably stranger with the appearance of the horse-headed women.
The Horse-Headed Aśvamukhīs
Among the most memorable sculptures at Hucchappayya Matha are nude women with unmistakably equine heads, shown interacting amorously with human males.
These figures are generally identified as aśvamukhīs, or “horse-faced” kinnarīs. Early Indian literary and artistic traditions could represent them in several different ways. The later and now perhaps more familiar form combines human and avian characteristics, but another ancient tradition represented them as human-bodied beings with horse heads. At Hucchappayya Matha the subject takes a particularly entertaining form.
An older study of kinnara iconography specifically describes the sculpture here as a naked horse-faced kinnarī beside an ascetic, whose minimal clothing and rosary identify him as a man who has supposedly renounced worldly pleasures. The pair stands beneath foliage, but whatever spiritual discipline the ascetic once possessed appears to be under considerable pressure.
The scene sets renunciation against desire: the disciplined ascetic confronted by a supernatural embodiment of sexuality and temptation. The joke would have been perfectly understandable to a medieval viewer.
The theme occurs elsewhere at Aihole, including Hucchappayya Gudi and the Durga and Lad Khan temples. One study of kinnaras noted several Aihole examples in which a horse-faced woman attempts to seduce or physically embraces a human male, sometimes an ascetic. The recurrence suggests that this was a recognisable visual theme rather than an isolated eccentricity on the part of one sculptor.
For me these figures are among the most appealing aspects of Early Chalukyan sculpture. They remind us that the artists working at Aihole were not restricted to solemn representations of gods. Their temples could accommodate comedy, desire, fantasy and observations about human weakness alongside the most serious religious imagery.
The Ceiling Sculptures
If the pillar carvings provide the humour, the ceilings provide much of the grandeur. Hucchappayya Matha preserves a superb series of large sculptured ceiling panels. Looking upwards along the central portion of the hall, the relatively plain architecture suddenly gives way to dense compositions of deities, attendants, sages, lotus ornament and scrolling vegetation.
One of the panels represents Viṣhṇu seated upon the coils of Seṣa or Ananta. Rather than the familiar reclining Anantasayana form, Viṣhṇu is enthroned upon the serpent coils. The composition belongs to a relatively early phase in the development of this iconographic type, and later parallels can be found elsewhere in the Deccan.
Another ceiling contains Shiva and Parvati associated with Nandi, giving this Shiva monument its most obvious divine focus beyond the linga itself. The panels are surrounded by elaborate ornamental frames of lotus rosettes, foliage and additional figures, turning each ceiling slab into something resembling a framed stone painting.
The Brahmā ceiling is particularly impressive. Brahmā is shown three-faced and seated upon his hamsa, or goose, which itself rests on a double-petalled lotus. He carries a rosary and a water vessel, while his upper hands probably once held sacrificial spoons. Around him is a lively group of rishis. Some approach reverently with hands joined; others carry offerings. One emaciated sage seems to be accompanied by a distinctly better-fed companion, another wonderful example of the individual character the sculptors could inject into secondary figures.
An Inscription and a Long Afterlife
The temple also preserves an Old Kannada inscription on one of its columns. When J. F. Fleet visited Aihole in the nineteenth century he described an inscription of about twenty-five lines in what he called the “Matha of Huchchayya”. Even then much of it was already difficult to decipher, but enough remained for Fleet to recognise that its preamble belonged to the period of the later Western Chalukyas.
This is significant because the temple itself is considerably earlier. The inscription therefore provides evidence not for the original construction of Hucchappayya Matha, but for its continued religious importance centuries after the Early Chalukyan period. The buildings of Aihole were not archaeological monuments during the medieval period; many remained active religious spaces, acquiring new inscriptions, modifications and associations as generations passed.
The Associated Matha
Behind or beside the principal temple is the simpler building generally identified as the actual matha.
Its restrained architecture provides a striking contrast with the sculpture-covered pillars of the temple. If the identification as a monastic establishment is correct, it would have provided space for members of a religious community associated with the shrine.
The survival of temple and matha together is useful because it reminds us that an early medieval temple did not necessarily function as an isolated building. Temples could form part of larger institutional landscapes incorporating accommodation, teaching, ritual activity, storage and the everyday needs of priests, ascetics and visitors.
Hucchappayya Matha in the Story of Aihole
Aihole is frequently described as a laboratory of Indian temple architecture, and the phrase has become something of a cliché. But monuments such as Hucchappayya Matha demonstrate why it remains useful.
There is no sense here of architects mechanically following a single established formula. The rectangular hall, arrangement of pillars, relationship between shrine and assembly space and treatment of the façade all belong to a period of considerable experimentation. The same applies to the sculpture.
The artists were willing to place Brahmā surrounded by sages above the heads of worshippers, Viṣhṇu upon the cosmic serpent nearby, and then carve a naked horse-headed kinnarī attempting to seduce an ascetic on a pillar below.
That combination says something important about Early Chalukyan art. The sacred world represented in these temples was not austere or detached from ordinary experience. It was crowded, sensual, humorous and occasionally bizarre. Gods shared architectural space with lovers, musicians, ascetics and supernatural creatures. Fertility and temptation could occupy the same monument as philosophical and ritual imagery.
And perhaps that is what I enjoy most about exploring the less celebrated temples here. At Aihole, wandering only a few hundred metres away from the famous monuments can reveal carvings every bit as memorable as those reproduced endlessly in guidebooks. Hucchappayya Matha is a perfect example: modest from a distance, but once inside, almost every pillar and ceiling rewards a closer look.
Hucchappayya Gudi – Aihole
Among the many temples scattered across Aihole, Hucchappayya Gudi is one of the easiest to confuse before you have even reached it. A short distance away stands another Early Chalukyan monument known as Hucchappayya Matha, and the two names are frequently mixed together in guidebooks, websites and even image captions. They are, however, entirely separate monuments. Hucchappayya Gudi lies farther south-west, away from the main concentration of temples and out towards the agricultural land leading towards the Malaprabha River.
This confusion is compounded by some erroneous labelling on Google Maps. There, Aralibasappa (Basavanna) Temple is incorrectly identified as the Hucchappayya Gudi , while the monument labelled simply as “Unknown historical Chalukyan Temple near Aihole”, on the southern fringes of the village, is actually Hucchappayya Gudi. Even the spelling varies considerably: Hucchappayya, Huchappayya, Huchchappayya, Huchchappaiyya and Huchappayana all appear in published material.
That relative isolation of Hucchappayya Gudi is part of its appeal. Aihole can at times feel like an enormous open-air laboratory of temple architecture, with one experiment seemingly beginning before the previous one has quite finished. Around the Durga Temple complex the monuments compete for attention, but Hucchappayya Gudi sits apart from all that. It is a comparatively compact building, and from a distance its most obvious feature is the surviving curvilinear rekhanagara shikhara rising above the sanctuary.
It is not one of Aihole’s grandest temples, but architecturally it is an important one. Here we can see the Early Chalukyan builders moving away from some of the broad, pavilion-like buildings represented by structures such as Lad Khan and towards something much closer to the familiar composition of the later Hindu temple: entrance porch, assembly hall, sanctuary and a vertical tower explicitly marking the sacred core of the building.
Dating Hucchappayya Gudi
Hucchappayya Gudi is generally assigned to the 7th century CE, during the rule of the Early Western Chalukyas, or Badami Chalukyas. There is some variation in published dating, with occasional descriptions placing it around the beginning of the 8th century, but the 7th-century date is supported particularly strongly by the sculptures removed from the temple and now preserved in Mumbai. The Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Vastu Sangrahalaya dates its celebrated Hucchappayya ceiling panels specifically to the 7th century CE.
That places the temple in one of the most interesting periods in the architectural history of the Deccan. Aihole was not producing a single fixed “Chalukyan style”. Its craftsmen were experimenting simultaneously with different plans, roof forms, towers, pillar arrangements and combinations of northern and southern Indian architectural traditions. Hucchappayya Gudi therefore makes most sense not as an isolated monument, but as one surviving answer to the question the builders of Aihole were repeatedly asking: what should a structural Hindu temple look like?
The Plan, Architecture and Sculpture
Modified plan originally published by R.S.Gupte in The Art and Architecture of Aihole (1967)
The temple faces east and has a remarkably clear progression of spaces. An entrance porch or mukhamandapa leads into a nearly square sabhamandapa, beyond which lies the sanctuary or garbhagriha. The principal hall measures approximately 7.3 metres square – and contains four substantial pillars arranged as a smaller square within the larger space. Four further supports define the entrance porch.
The resulting plan is wonderfully disciplined. Instead of the more complicated circumambulatory arrangements seen at temples such as Hucchimalli Gudi, Hucchappayya belongs to a style where there is no enclosed passage running around the sanctuary. The worshipper is instead drawn directly along the building’s east-west axis, moving from the open porch into the hall and finally towards the darkened sanctum.
Unfortunately, the temple was locked when I visited, with no sign of a caretaker or guard who might have been able to open it. I therefore had to content myself with exploring and photographing the exterior
Outside, the sanctuary projects beyond the main hall and is crowned by the temple’s most conspicuous architectural feature, its rekhanagara shikhara. Rather than the stepped pyramidal profile associated with Dravida temples, this northern or Nagara-derived form rises in a continuous curving outline. The summit is incomplete: the crowning amalaka, normally a large ribbed stone disc, and the kalasha finial above it have disappeared. Nevertheless, enough survives to make the vertical intention of the design unmistakable.
This is an important difference from some of Aihole’s earlier temples. At Lad Khan, for example, the building remains overwhelmingly horizontal. At Hucchappayya Gudi the sanctuary announces itself externally with a tower, identifying the sacred centre before one enters the building.
The main body of the temple has little ornamentation, aside from two of the three niches on the outer sanctuary walls. Here can be found Narasimha (west) and Shiva dancing in the skin of the elephant demon he has just slain (north). The southern niche is now empty.
Right : Shiva dancing in the skin of the elephant demon
The most interesting external carvings are associated with the porch, in particular a pair of near naked horse-headed women (Aśvamukhī) embracing bearded males flanking the entrance.
The Inscription of Narasobba
One of the most remarkable features of Hucchappayya Gudi is a short inscription naming Narasobba, the architect-sculptor associated with the temple. In contrast to the royal inscriptions that dominate much of early medieval India, this is essentially a celebration of the craftsman himself. It is an unusually confident statement of professional pride.
The inscription is carved on the north-facing side of the north-western porch pillar (as indicated in the above plan), and reads:
Svasti Jambudvīpāntare kaścit
vāstu-prāsāda-tadgataḥ
Narasobba-samo vidvān
na bhūto na bhaviṣyati
The exact segmentation and transliteration varies slightly between publications, but the sense is clear. This broadly translates to :
“Hail! In all Jambudvīpa there has never been, nor will there ever be, a learned man skilled in the construction of buildings and temples equal to Narasobba.”
Jambudvīpa is an ancient cosmological and geographical term which effectively means the Indian world, or even the known world. The inscription is therefore making an extraordinary claim: that no architect of the past or future could equal Narasobba.
That boast becomes even more significant because Narasobba is mentioned in another inscription at Aihole. On a boulder near the Jain Mena Basti cave, a second epigraph describes him in much greater detail. It identifies him as a disciple of Binjadi and praises him as a man who delighted in the making of temples, was master of the architectural śāstras (knowledge), possessed outstanding qualities, created sculptural forms, and understood correct proportion.
This inscription reads:
Śrī-Biñjaḍi-[vida]rddhara-caṭṭan
vimāna-rañjitan
śāstra-maheśvaran guṇa-Ravi
rūpa-saṃghaṭan pramāṇa-bhāran Narasobban
Which broadly translates as:
“[Narasobba], the disciple of Binjadi, one who delights in the making of temples, a great lord of the śāstras, a Sun in qualities, a maker of forms, and proficient in the science of proportions.”
The location of this second inscription is equally interesting. The area near the Jain Mena Basti cave also preserves a marked stone quarry associated with Narasobba, referred to as his kani or quarry. That raises the possibility that we are looking not only at inscriptions praising an individual artisan, but at traces of the actual working landscape from which he and his workshop obtained stone.
The second Narasobba inscription can be seen on the rock face, one line in two sections.
Taken together, the two inscriptions transform our understanding of Hucchappayya Gudi. Instead of being simply another anonymous Early Chalukya monument, it can be linked to a named craftsman whose reputation was sufficiently great to be commemorated in stone more than once. The surviving inscriptions portray Narasobba as architect, sculptor and master of proportion — and, judging by the inscription at Hucchappayya Gudi, as a man whose workshop was not especially troubled by modesty !
The Lost Ceiling of Hucchappayya Gudi
Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of Hucchappayya Gudi is that some of its finest sculpture is no longer at Aihole at all.
Today, anyone who manages to stand inside the mandapa is looking at a building that has lost a significant part of its original sculptural programme. At some point the decorated ceiling collapsed, leaving several great relief slabs lying among the debris. In 1926, three of these sculptures were acquired by what was then the Prince of Wales Museum in Bombay, now the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Vastu Sangrahalaya (CSMVS), Mumbai. The museum itself records them as having originally formed part of the ceiling of Hucchappayya Gudi.
The best known is a magnificent representation of Brahma carved in pink sandstone. Measuring roughly 125 × 220.5 cm, the relief shows Brahma seated on a lotus, attended by rishis and worshippers. His vehicle, the hamsa or swan, turns towards him below. Brahma holds the rosary or akshamala, a sacrificial ladle and a kamandalu, while another hand is extended in the boon-giving varadamudra. The museum dates the sculpture to the 7th century.
Originally in the mandapa of Hucchappayya Gudi, but moved to Mumbai in the 1920s
The composition is particularly striking because of the contrast between Brahma’s almost immovable central presence and the activity surrounding him. Bearded sages emerge around the deity while worshippers gather below, their bodies arranged in a remarkably natural manner. Although carved as an architectural ceiling slab, it functions almost like an independent monumental sculpture.
A second panel depicts Vishnu reclining upon the serpent Shesha, the cosmic serpent whose coils form the god’s couch. This sculpture is also securely identified with Hucchappayya Gudi and is now also displayed in the CSMVS sculpture gallery.
Originally in the mandapa of Hucchappayya Gudi, but moved to Mumbai in the 1920s
The third great ceiling relief represents Uma-Maheshvara – Shiva and Parvati together. Museum documentation associates all three surviving slabs with the fallen ceiling of the temple, giving us some idea of how impressive the mandapa must once have been. Instead of entering beneath plain stone slabs, a visitor would have looked upward into an entire divine world.
Originally in the mandapa of Hucchappayya Gudi, but moved to Mumbai in the 1920s
Some of the finest surviving Early Chalukyan sculptures from Aihole once looked down directly upon worshippers from the ceiling here. It is a little disappointing that these remarkable panels were not reinstated in their original positions, but perhaps we should instead be grateful that they survived apparently intact and are now safely preserved in a museum, even if that museum is some considerable distance from their original home
Hucchappayya Gudi belongs to a moment when architectural and sculptural ideas were still fluid.
Perhaps nowhere is that more apparent than in the extraordinary ceiling sculptures. The Brahma, reclining Vishnu and Uma-Maheshvara panels now displayed hundreds of kilometres away in Mumbai reveal the artistic ambition hidden behind the temple’s modest exterior. They also provide a tantalising glimpse of what entering Hucchappayya Gudi would have been like thirteen centuries ago.
Today the temple stands quietly among the fields, somewhat detached from the monuments most visitors associate with Aihole. That isolation may actually work in its favour. Without the crowds and architectural competition of the main complex, it becomes easier to read the building for what it is: a remarkably complete statement of Early Chalukyan architectural experimentation, created at the point when the freestanding Hindu temple was acquiring the form that would define it for generations to come.
Note : On Google Maps, Hucchappayya Gudi is merely labelled as “Unknown historical Chalukyan Temple near Aihole” :
Beyond the Temples: Discovering the Prehistoric Dolmen Field and Rock Art of Aihole
Most visitors come to Aihole to admire its extraordinary collection of Early Chalukyan temples. Often described as the cradle of Indian temple architecture, the village contains more than one hundred and twenty monuments dating primarily between the sixth and eighth centuries CE. Yet long before the first stone temple was conceived, people had already chosen this dramatic sandstone landscape as a place to live, create art, and bury their dead.
Hidden among the rocky slopes of Meguti Hill are two of Aihole’s least-known archaeological treasures: an extensive prehistoric dolmen field and a series of rock shelters containing ancient paintings. Rarely visited and largely overlooked by tourists, these sites reveal a human story that stretches back thousands of years before the rise of the Chalukyas. For those prepared to leave the temple circuit behind, they offer an opportunity to experience a very different chapter in the history of the Deccan.
The red sandstone outcrops surrounding Aihole have shaped human activity for millennia. Their natural shelters provided protection from the elements, while elevated ridges offered commanding views across the fertile Malaprabha valley. Seasonal streams, abundant building stone, and productive agricultural land made the region attractive long before written history began.
Archaeological evidence suggests that people occupied this landscape from prehistoric times, leaving behind stone tools, rock paintings and, later, monumental burial structures. The continuity of occupation is remarkable. Few places in southern India preserve such a complete sequence of human activity, from prehistoric hunter-gatherers through Iron Age communities and into the flourishing temple-building civilisation of the Early Chalukyas.
It is perhaps no coincidence that the hill later chosen for the famous Meguti Jain Temple had already possessed ritual significance for thousands of years.
The easiest approach begins at Mena Basti, the remarkable rock-cut Jain cave on the southern slopes of Meguti Hill. From here a well-worn footpath climbs steadily across exposed sandstone towards the summit. The ascent is short but moderately steep, taking around ten to fifteen minutes, and rewards visitors with increasingly expansive views over Aihole and its surrounding countryside.
Before reaching the summit, the landscape begins to change. Large sandstone slabs lie scattered across the hillside, while patches of scrub and grasses break up the bare rock. It is amongst these natural formations that the first prehistoric monuments come into view.
At first glance they resemble ordinary piles of stone. Only on closer inspection does their deliberate construction become obvious.
Spread across the summit plateau is one of Karnataka’s finest surviving groups of prehistoric dolmens, about fifty in total. Although less famous than the megalithic cemeteries at Hire Benakal or Brahmagiri, the Aihole field remains an impressive example of Iron Age funerary architecture.
A dolmen is essentially a stone burial chamber formed from large upright slabs supporting a massive capstone. The word itself derives from the Breton language, meaning “stone table”, a description that accurately captures their appearance. Similar monuments occur throughout Europe, the Middle East and Asia, although those of peninsular India belong to a distinct regional megalithic tradition.
The dolmens at Aihole vary considerably in size and preservation. Some remain almost complete, their capstones still resting securely upon three or four carefully erected orthostats. Others have collapsed over the centuries, leaving scattered slabs that are easily overlooked by the casual observer.
Some dolmens may have once had circular port-holes cut through one of the side slabs, a characteristic feature of many South Indian megalithic burials. The precise purpose of these openings remains uncertain. Archaeologists have suggested they may have allowed offerings to be placed within the chamber after burial, symbolically connected the living with the dead, or represented a ritual doorway through which the spirit of the deceased could pass.
The builders displayed considerable engineering skill. Individual slabs often weigh several tonnes and had to be quarried, transported and erected using only simple tools and human labour. Their survival after nearly three thousand years is testimony to both careful construction and the durability of the local sandstone.
Most archaeologists attribute the Aihole dolmens to the South Indian Iron Age, generally between about 1200 and 800 BCE, although some megalithic traditions continued into the early centuries BCE. During this period communities across the Deccan developed increasingly sophisticated metalworking technologies, cultivated crops on a larger scale and established more permanent settlements.
Burial practices also became more elaborate. Instead of simple graves, important individuals were often interred beneath substantial stone monuments, accompanied by pottery, iron implements, beads and personal ornaments. Excavations at comparable sites throughout Karnataka have recovered swords, spearheads, black-and-red ware pottery and occasionally the remains of domesticated animals deposited as funerary offerings.
Although the Aihole dolmens themselves have seen only limited archaeological investigation, they clearly belong to this wider megalithic cultural tradition that once extended across much of southern India.
Only a short distance from the Mena Basti below the dolmen field, four natural rock shelters preserve another remarkable chapter in Aihole’s prehistoric past. These shallow sandstone overhangs contain paintings that are considerably older than the megalithic burials, representing one of the earliest forms of artistic expression in the region.
Unlike the monumental stone architecture of the Iron Age, the paintings were created by communities of hunter-gatherers who used the shelters as temporary camps or places of ritual significance. Although difficult to date with precision, stylistic comparisons with other rock art sites across the Deccan suggest that some of the paintings may have originated during the Mesolithic period, perhaps between 6000 and 3000 BCE, while others may belong to later prehistoric phases. This means the artists who decorated these shelters lived several thousand years before the people who constructed the nearby dolmens.
The paintings were executed primarily in red ochre, a naturally occurring iron-rich pigment that has survived remarkably well on the protected sandstone surfaces. In most places weathering has faded the images almost beyond recognition.
One of the fascinating aspects of Indian rock art is that many shelters contain paintings from several different periods. Later generations repeatedly returned to the same locations, sometimes adding new figures alongside earlier ones. The result is a visual record spanning centuries, or even millennia, demonstrating the enduring significance of particular places within the landscape.
Although potentially separated by thousands of years, the rock art and the dolmens illustrate an important principle in archaeology: landscapes often retain their significance long after the cultures that first occupied them have disappeared.
The hunter-gatherers who painted the shelters almost certainly had no connection with the Iron Age communities who later erected the dolmens. Their economies, technologies and ways of life were fundamentally different. Yet both groups were drawn to the same sandstone hills overlooking the Malaprabha valley.
Centuries later, the Early Chalukyas selected these same hillsides for one of India’s most important centres of temple architecture. The summit of Meguti Hill became the setting for the celebrated Meguti Jain Temple, while its lower slopes were excavated to create the Mena Basti cave. Whether consciously or unconsciously, the Chalukyan builders became part of a tradition of human activity on the hill that already stretched back several thousand years.
This remarkable continuity transforms Meguti Hill from a simple archaeological site into a cultural landscape. Every period has left its mark, creating a sequence that extends from prehistoric artists and Iron Age communities to medieval architects and modern visitors.
Exploring the dolmen field and rock shelters requires little more than a reasonable level of fitness and suitable footwear. The climb from Mena Basti is short, but the sandstone can become slippery after rain and extremely hot during the middle of the day. Early morning or late afternoon offers the most comfortable conditions, while the elevated position provides magnificent views across the temple complexes and surrounding countryside.
Visitors should remember that these are fragile archaeological remains rather than picnic sites. The dolmens should never be climbed upon, and the rock paintings should only be viewed from a respectful distance without touching the decorated surfaces. A pair of binoculars or a camera with a zoom lens can often reveal faded details that are otherwise difficult to distinguish.
Aihole’s temples rightly attract international attention, yet they represent only one chapter in a much longer human story. The prehistoric rock art and the Meguti Hill dolmen field remind us that people had already been living, creating and commemorating their dead in this landscape for thousands of years before the first Chalukyan architect laid a foundation stone.
For those willing to venture beyond the familiar temple circuit, these little-visited sites offer a rare opportunity to experience Aihole as archaeologists see it: not simply as the birthplace of Indian temple architecture, but as a landscape preserving an almost uninterrupted record of human activity from prehistory to the medieval world. Standing amongst the silent dolmens, with the painted shelters below and the temples of Aihole spread across the valley, it becomes possible to appreciate the extraordinary depth of history contained within this remarkable corner of Karnataka.
What to see in Aihole?
 |
| Durga temple and Aihole fort Ravalaphadi and Prehistoric burial chamber |
Aihole's prehistoric connection is strong; it is a part of a huge prehistoric site covering hills and valleys between Badami - Pattadakal - Aihole. The sandstone hillock to the east of Aihole has plenty of evidence of prehistoric activity; rock paintings, stone circle and megalithic burial chambers have been found here and they can be seen to this day. Also archaeologists have found stone implements dating back to Neolithic period in Malaprabha riverbed.
Here's a map showing the known monuments of Aihole.
Here's a list of temples, while most are groups of temples some are individual temples. (click on hyper-links to see details).
- Durga temple complex and Archaeological museum
- Ambigyar temple complex
- Rachi temple
- Eniyar temple or Veniyar temple
- Huchappayyana Matha
- Kunti Gudi complex
- Charantimath complex
- Gowri temple
- Jain temple complex
- Chikki temple
- Tarabasappa temple complex
- Hucchimalli temple complex
- Ravanaphadi rock-cut temple
- Jyotirlinga temple complex
- Mallikarjuna temple complex
- Buddhist Charityalaya
- Meguti temple and fort
- Boyar Gudi
- Ancient quarry site
- Rock-cut Jain Basadi
- Prehistroic burial chambers and Prehistoric rock art
- Galaganatha temple complex
- Ramlingeshwara temple complex
- Tryambakeshwara temple complex
- Monolithic rock-cut temple on the western slope
- Ruins of Aihole fort
- Cairns or Stone Circles
- Maliyavvana Gudi
- Akkargal fort
- Shankarlingeshwara Gudi at Motar Maradi
- Ancient sandstone quarry at Motar Maradi
- Siddanakolla (also known as Siddhankal)
- Haalsiddeshwara fort
Aihole Fort and Meguthi Temple
My first visit to Aihole and Meguti Temple was February 1996, during the 13-day tour around Karnataka on Hero Honda Splendor. I had forgotten about the fort completely. That's our guide whose name I cannot recall and me.
It's only recently I rediscovered Aihole Fort.
April 3, 2011.
We arrive at Aihole around noon and spend time at
Durga temple, Ravna Phadi temple, two other temple complexes, have lunch
at a local Khanavali and come to the fort.
View of the hill, two-story Buddhist temple, fort and Meguti Gudi from Ravanaphadi rock cut temple.
At the foot of the hill.
Half way up the hill.
I pass by the two-story Buddhist Chaitya.
Meguti Gudi as seen from the fort gateway.
Google Map screen shot of Aihole Fort.
A - Stairway
B - Two-story Buddhist temple
C - Fort gateway
D - Meguti temple
E - Desai Vade
The fort walls are restored recently, stones packed with mud. The wall is not very high, at places its barely 10 feet. I went walking on the wall, clock-wise. I'm standing on South-East bastion looking towards the fort gateway.
And to left, the South-West bastion. The water-body in the background must be Malaprabha river.
Closer look at the bastion. The job seems well done... on the surface. But the walls are pretty fragile. I wonder if the walls can withstand a good rainy season. The mud might run off with water under a heavy shower.
Rear side of Meguti temple. What a handsome structure it is!
The South-West bastion as seen from middle of the Western wall.
The North-West bastion.
As seen from the North-West corner.
The structure looks solid and neat. The architecture is purely functional.
Quoting two lines from Wikipedia- The temple which was possibly never completed gives important evidence of early development in dravidian style of architecture. The dated inscription found on the outer wall of the temple records the construction of the temple by Ravikeerthi, a scholar in the court of emperor Pulakeshi II.
The half-standing tower in the middle and the sloping roof caught my attention. The place has a different look... it's a Desai vaade. Later in the day we actually visited the vaade. The owners live in some city, the care-takers showed us around. The place was being renovated.
Ancient sculptures of two couples.
Is that Buddha in meditating position?
On the way down, I stop by the two-story Buddhist temple. The first floor had a rock-cut chamber, probably used for meditating.
Simply beautiful! I'm awe struck at the simple styling.
A signature in stone.
Praveen had come down quite some time back and befriended two brothers, locals living just where the steps start. They were chatting about agriculture and prices of jowar. One of the brothers has settled in Udupi and was on a vacation. The little girl in the middle is the Udupi brother's grand-daughter and the other two girls are her Aihole cousins.
.........
